Wealth management, money management, asset management, investment, Financial planning, retirement planner, Registered Investment advisor, Independent advisor,  401(k), Retirement distribution, Wealth, Los Angeles, investing, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Retirement Specialist, Fee-based, fee-only advisor, Money, finances, capital, retire, college, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, exchange, trading, traded, RIA, IRA, CFA, CFP, CFS, senior consultant, consultant, life planner, Variable annuity, income specialist, tax-deferred annuities, tax-deferred investments, tax-shelters, hedge fund, asset protection, 403, annuity tax-free, tax-free, tax planning, Heath Biddlecome, Stella Walz, Rita Saputra, Anthony Arefian, 6101 W. Centinela Avenue, Suite 335, LA, California, Certified Financial Planner, FPALA, Financial Planning Association, Charles Schwab Institutional, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Datalynx, Russell Group, TD Waterhouse, Hewitt Associaties.
Who We Are
Our Services
Our Partners
Success Stories
Newsletter
Client Center
F.A.Q.
Contact Us

Retired couple poolside

We would like to share a few success stories with you of several of our clients. Their names have been changed for confidentiality reasons.

1. Meet Bill and Anne. They are 63 and 61 years old, respectively, and retired. When we first met them, the majority of their wealth was split between real estate, trust accounts and an IRA account. They were living off of the income from Bill's pension from his 36-year employment with Boeing.

At the time, a large brokerage firm was managing their account through investments in stocks. Their broker was consistently buying and selling stocks, in an attempt to "time the market." In other words, the brokerage firm was taking huge risks that were not paying off for Bill and Anne. We found that their broker was investing their IRA money in very high-risk technology companies, which were far too risky for the couple. In addition, their trust was listed as the beneficiary of the IRA account. This could have potentially been one of the biggest mistakes Bill and Anne ever made.

The first thing we did with Bill and Anne was to evaluate their financial situation, investment objective, goals and risk tolerance. Next, we conducted a review of their trust, IRA beneficiary information, and other relevant paperwork.

After our initial review, we found two major problems with their situation. First, they were taking too much risk in their IRA. They needed to get into a diversified portfolio of high quality stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. This would allow their principle to grow at a more steady and predictable rate. Secondly, the naming of the trust as the beneficiary could be a mistake, which may have potentially resulted in tax consequences of up to 50% of the IRA value. If not done correctly, upon the death of the IRA owner, the entire IRA may be distributed and become 100% taxable. We intervened and advised Bill and Anne to change the beneficiaries on the IRA. Thanks to tax laws passed in 2003, the children now have the option to create a "Stretch-IRA" upon the passing of the IRA owner and take an advantage of the tax deferral treatment of an IRA over their life expectancy. If it hadn't been for IFC Advisory, Bill and Anne could have lost a substantial amount of money.


2. Let us introduce you to Jan and Larry. They are 63 and 64 years old, respectively, and retired. Jan was a school teacher for 25 years, and Larry was a manager at Pfizer for 35 years.

When Larry retired, his 401(k) plan was worth nearly $500,000. His insurance salesman advised him to rollover his 401(k) to a variable annuity. As a result, Larry spoke to his HR department and asked them to send him a check for the entire amount.

Upon receiving the check, Larry and Jan were shocked to find out that close to $100,000 was withheld for taxes. They had not been told by their insurance salesman that a full distribution request from a 401(k) plan would be immediately taxable unless the funds were transferred to a qualified account in 60 days or less. Jan and Larry became skeptical about their insurance salesman and came to us for a second opinion.

As always, the first thing we did with Jan and Larry was to go over their investment objectives and future financial goals. Next, we looked over all of their paperwork. We immediately noticed that Larry took a normal distribution, rather than a Trustee to Trustee transfer or an IRA Rollover. This resulted in the 20% withholding by his former employer. In addition, we questioned why their insurance salesman advised Jan and Larry to invest in a variable annuity, when gains in an IRA are already tax deferred. A variable annuity did not offer any additional benefits to the couple and charged nearly 3% in annual fees. Furthermore, we determined that the insurance salesman would be paid a 6% commission on the sale of the annuity. Clearly, the best interests of his clients did not come first.

To assuage this potentially catastrophic situation, we advised Jan and Larry to cancel the annuity during the free-look period and open an IRA Rollover account. We also recommended that they match the 20% tax withheld to make the 401(k) plan whole again to avoid paying any taxes.

The IRA account is now invested in a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, and mutual funds, tailored to their retirement plans for a long and steady growth. Jan and Larry are very happy with the unbiased and objective advice they have received and continue to receive from IFC Advisory.


* Disclaimer: Such successes are not guaranteed for similar situations, as each case is different. Results will vary by client.



  Southern California Office Central California Office  
  6101 W. Centinela Avenue
Suite 335
Culver City, CA 90230
Tel: (800) 632-2463
e-mail: info@ifcadvisory.com
2125 S. Broadway
Suite 110
Santa Maria, CA 93454
Tel: (805) 346-2989